The Latest On The FHA Bills In Congress
A few weeks ago, we talked about Congress, the Bush Administration and the FHA and a bill that was being debated. Perhaps it is time for an update on where the legislation stands.
Congress believes it has the right, and the obligation, to pass laws that would allow and even require that some $300 billion worth of troubled loans would be turned over to the FHA to manage. There is little doubt that there are risks for everyone involved in such a turnover. Nevertheless, as much as people are talking about the risks this would place on consumers, the government and plenty of other people, there has been movement within Congress regarding the process.
The bill passed throughout the House. It is now on the floor of the Senate and being debated. The bill has been expanded to now include some 1.5 million loans; most of these loans are subprime, high-risk home loans.
While the FHA is an outstanding organization and provides a lifeline to those that need it, the debate centers around one fact: should Congress step in and force the FHA to take these substantially risky loans at the taxpayer’s expense. More so, just a few weeks back, FHA announced that last year, the 2007 fiscal year, say a loss of some $4.6 billion dollars. That is the largest and most severe drop the government agency has ever seen. Yet, more risk is in order here through even more loans that are high risk?
As with everything in Congress, the Senate did make some changes to the bill. They added what is being called a modernization. This will provide the FHA with the ability to lower the amount of a required down payment by the potential homeowner while still allowing the agency to nearly double the loan limits in place. The problem I see here is that this may put even more risk on the heads of taxpayers. Tens of billions of dollars worth of risky loans could be on the taxpayer’s head. Is that the right route to take?
There is a lot of speculation as to why the FHA struggled last year. Yet, looking forward, the goal of this agency is to provide a financially sound start for those who need it. In addition to this, you have to wonder if this will help to pull the country out of its housing situation. Can one agency be called on to do so much?
Another worrisome area of the Senate’s proposal is the fact that the FHA will be able to take loans from private banks that are funding them. The problem is that these are the highest risk subprime loans, which puts additional risk on the agency.
According to Brian Montgomery who is the current FHA commissioner, the bill would strap the agency considerably. After talking about the losses from last year, he noted that the FHA would be further in the red should the bill pass Congress and be signed into law. In fact, it is not just speculation. Many of the lenders who have funded these high-risk loans are now saying that they will take the “bailout” and hand over the loans to the FHA to manage.
Reports show that people are looking for answers to their home loan needs. For many people, FHA loans are the best type of loan to fund your home, and I highly recommend that anyone that may be struggling or otherwise looking for a good deal to contact FHA lenders to find out what solutions are available to them. There is no doubt this agency has every ability to help many.
